Non-Violence - The History of a Dangerous Idea
by Mark Kurlansky (2006) This is a frustrating read, primarily because the author is very much the historian and not a writer or ethicist. To be fair, he does do what the title suggests, but unless you are gripped by a wide range of historical detail that is touched on quickly and is therefore difficult to retain, you are not likely to draw many useful lessons from history from the bulk of this book. The moral and practical lessons would have been better drawn from fewer or more thematically bunched historical examples and with much more explication. The author does try to save the day in the very last chapter which is a bullet point list of the lessons about non-violence that he has drawn from history but these really should have been better explained into the previous chapters and not simply appended out of context. Further, the stark nature of the list makes it easier to question many of his conclusions as it implies a form of historicism that the s...